Date of Award

Spring 2024

Degree Type

Thesis

Department

Political Science

Director of Thesis

Dr. Doug Thompson

Second Reader

Dr. Ken Masugi

Abstract

The study advances a reinterpretation of Madison’s concept of “constitutional liquidation,” presenting it not merely as a theory of legal interpretation but as a broader political strategy for preserving republican government amid recurring crises. Through an analysis of Madison’s responses to the Alien and Sedition Acts, the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions, and the nullification controversy, the thesis demonstrates how Madison sought to balance constitutional stability with principled conflict, allowing fundamental questions of authority, justice, and union to be resolved through disciplined public deliberation rather than force or procedural formalism.

Finally, the thesis contends that Madison’s commitment to national supremacy and uniform government was inseparable from a moral horizon grounded in natural right, a framework that ultimately rendered compromise with foundational injustice untenable. In this respect, Madison’s statesmanship helped establish the conditions for later constitutional reckonings, culminating in the Lincolnian confrontation with slavery. By recovering Madison as a thinker of regime preservation rather than institutional stasis, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of constitutional development, public opinion, and the moral demands of republican self-government.

First Page

1

Last Page

59

Rights

© 2024, Andre Chang

Share

COinS