CS11 - Relationship Between Athletic Department Financing and Student ROI

SCURS Disciplines

Business

Document Type

General Poster

Invited Presentation Choice

Not Applicable

Abstract

Introduction

Allen (2022) examined the relationship between allocated funds (tuition/fees) that subsidize athletic department operations and student Return on Investment (ROI). Only public NCAA Division I institutions were examined because relevant data is not publicly available for private institutions. The objective of the present study is to replicate Allen’s 2022 study, but with current NCAA financial data as well as utilizing a different ROI calculation referred to as Net Present Value (College NPV, 2025). When student tuition and fees are allocated towards subsidizing athletics, students need to ensure that they are still receiving adequate ROI upon graduation. This is especially concerning considering millions of Americans are struggling with burdensome student loan debt (Forbes, 2025).

Methodology

NCAA financial data made public via USA Today (2024) wasexamined in order to determine the nominal value as well as percentage of the overall athletic budget that is considered allocated funds. Allocated funds are not generated by the athletic department. Rather, they are transferred from the institution’s general funds in order to subsidize athletic departments that are not generating enough revenue to fund their operation. Additionally, data made public via College NPV was used to determine the ROI for students at the corresponding public NCAA Division I institutions.

A census was obtained from a finite population (231 public NCAA Division I institutions). A Pearson correlation coefficientwas utilized to examine the relationship between allocated funds and student ROI. Excel was used for data entry as well as the Pearson correlation. A critical values table was utilized to determine statistical significance of the Pearson correlation coefficient (UCONN, 2015).

Results

Descriptive statistics revealed the average percentage of allocated funds was 54.25% and while 12 institutions received zero dollars in allocated funds, 67 institutions received at least 75% of their total athletic budget from allocated funds. College ROI, in terms of Net Present Value, ranged from as low as -$101,956 to as high as +$858,638. The average ROI from the 231 public institutions in the dataset was +$103,142. The researchers identified a significant relationship between allocated funds and college ROI; r (229) = -.40, p < .01. There was a negative, inverse relationship between allocated funds and college ROI. Implications are discussed.

References

Allen, J. T. (2022). The Relationship Between Allocated Funds and College Student Return on Investment at Public NCAA Division I Institutions. Poster presented at the 13th Annual International Conference on Sport & Society, Aarhus, Denmark.

College NPV, Colleges Ranked by Return on Investment (2025).

https://www.collegenpv.com/collegerankings?query=&page=1&sort=rank_desc

Forbes, Student Loans For 6.4 Million Borrowers Are Heading Toward A Dangerous ‘Cliff’ (2025).

https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamminsky/2025/12/15/student-loans-for-64-million-borrowers-are-heading-toward-a-dangerous-cliff/

UCONN, Educational Research Basics by Del Siegle (2015). r Critical Value Table.

https://researchbasics.education.uconn.edu/r_critical_value_table/

USA Today, NCAA Finances: Revenues and Expenses by School (2024).

https://sportsdata.usatoday.com/ncaa/finances

Keywords

Finance, NCAA Athletics

Start Date

10-4-2026 9:30 AM

Location

University Readiness Center Greatroom

End Date

10-4-2026 11:30 AM

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 10th, 9:30 AM Apr 10th, 11:30 AM

CS11 - Relationship Between Athletic Department Financing and Student ROI

University Readiness Center Greatroom

Introduction

Allen (2022) examined the relationship between allocated funds (tuition/fees) that subsidize athletic department operations and student Return on Investment (ROI). Only public NCAA Division I institutions were examined because relevant data is not publicly available for private institutions. The objective of the present study is to replicate Allen’s 2022 study, but with current NCAA financial data as well as utilizing a different ROI calculation referred to as Net Present Value (College NPV, 2025). When student tuition and fees are allocated towards subsidizing athletics, students need to ensure that they are still receiving adequate ROI upon graduation. This is especially concerning considering millions of Americans are struggling with burdensome student loan debt (Forbes, 2025).

Methodology

NCAA financial data made public via USA Today (2024) wasexamined in order to determine the nominal value as well as percentage of the overall athletic budget that is considered allocated funds. Allocated funds are not generated by the athletic department. Rather, they are transferred from the institution’s general funds in order to subsidize athletic departments that are not generating enough revenue to fund their operation. Additionally, data made public via College NPV was used to determine the ROI for students at the corresponding public NCAA Division I institutions.

A census was obtained from a finite population (231 public NCAA Division I institutions). A Pearson correlation coefficientwas utilized to examine the relationship between allocated funds and student ROI. Excel was used for data entry as well as the Pearson correlation. A critical values table was utilized to determine statistical significance of the Pearson correlation coefficient (UCONN, 2015).

Results

Descriptive statistics revealed the average percentage of allocated funds was 54.25% and while 12 institutions received zero dollars in allocated funds, 67 institutions received at least 75% of their total athletic budget from allocated funds. College ROI, in terms of Net Present Value, ranged from as low as -$101,956 to as high as +$858,638. The average ROI from the 231 public institutions in the dataset was +$103,142. The researchers identified a significant relationship between allocated funds and college ROI; r (229) = -.40, p < .01. There was a negative, inverse relationship between allocated funds and college ROI. Implications are discussed.

References

Allen, J. T. (2022). The Relationship Between Allocated Funds and College Student Return on Investment at Public NCAA Division I Institutions. Poster presented at the 13th Annual International Conference on Sport & Society, Aarhus, Denmark.

College NPV, Colleges Ranked by Return on Investment (2025).

https://www.collegenpv.com/collegerankings?query=&page=1&sort=rank_desc

Forbes, Student Loans For 6.4 Million Borrowers Are Heading Toward A Dangerous ‘Cliff’ (2025).

https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamminsky/2025/12/15/student-loans-for-64-million-borrowers-are-heading-toward-a-dangerous-cliff/

UCONN, Educational Research Basics by Del Siegle (2015). r Critical Value Table.

https://researchbasics.education.uconn.edu/r_critical_value_table/

USA Today, NCAA Finances: Revenues and Expenses by School (2024).

https://sportsdata.usatoday.com/ncaa/finances