Social Q&A and Virtual Reference—Comparing Apples and Oranges with the Help of Experts and Users
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Online question‐answering (Q&A) services are becoming increasingly popular among information seekers. We divide them into two categories, social Q&A (SQA) and virtual reference (VR), and examine how experts (librarians) and end users (students) evaluate information within both categories. To accomplish this, we first performed an extensive literature review and compiled a list of the aspects found to contribute to a “good” answer. These aspects were divided among three high‐level concepts: relevance, quality, and satisfaction. We then interviewed both experts and users, asking them first to reflect on their online Q&A experiences and then comment on our list of aspects. These interviews uncovered two main disparities. One disparity was found between users’ expectations with these services and how information was actually delivered among them, and the other disparity between the perceptions of users …
Publication Info
Published in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Volume 63, Issue 10, 2012, pages 2020-2036.
Copyright of Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology is the property of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
© Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2012, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Shah, C., & Kitzie, V. (2012). Social Q&A and virtual reference-comparing apples and oranges with the help of experts and users. Journal Of The American Society For Information Science And Technology, 63(10), 2020-2036.
doi: 10.1002/asi.22699