•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This study examined decision-making by student-athlete advisory committee (SAAC) members within a hegemonic characterization of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). Findings revealed that athletes prioritized decisions with tangible, immediate impact – such as mental and physical health and peer support – over broader systemic issues like NCAA legislation. While athletes actively participated in select areas, their perceived influence remained low, particularly within athletic department policy decisions, where findings indicated the greatest gap between participation and desired influence. Such findings reflect a systemic power imbalance that limits athlete agency, reinforced by fears of retribution and structural exclusion from meaningful governance. Although SAAC offers nominal participation, its current form lacks genuine influence. The study advocates for a more empowered SAAC structure or alternative governance reforms, such as independent athlete representation or collective bargaining. These changes could disrupt entrenched power dynamics and create a more democratic, participatory decision-making environment within collegiate athletics.

Download

Share

COinS