https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-11

">
 

Document Type

Article

Subject Area(s)

Adult; Depression, Postpartum (prevention & control); Ethnicity; Female; Humans; Infant; Intention to Treat Analysis; Maternal Health Services (methods); Midwifery; Mother-Child Relations; Mothers (psychology); Parity; Postnatal Care (methods, psychology); Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome (ethnology, psychology); Pregnant Women (psychology); Prenatal Care (methods, psychology); Qualitative Research; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Social Support; United Kingdom

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maternal, neonatal and child health outcomes are worse in families from black and ethnic minority groups and disadvantaged backgrounds. There is little evidence on whether lay support improves maternal and infant outcomes among women with complex social needs within a disadvantaged multi-ethnic population in the United Kingdom (UK). METHOD/DESIGN: The aim of this study is to evaluate a lay Pregnancy Outreach Worker (POW) service for nulliparous women identified as having social risk within a maternity service that is systematically assessing social risks alongside the usual obstetric and medical risks. The study design is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in nulliparous women assessed as having social risk comparing standard maternity care with the addition of referral to the POW support service. The POWs work alongside community midwifery teams and offer individualised support to women to encourage engagement with services (health and social care) from randomisation (before 28 weeks gestation) until 6 weeks after birth. The primary outcomes have been chosen on the basis that they are linked to maternal and infant health. The two primary outcomes are engagement with antenatal care, assessed by the number of antenatal visits; and maternal depression, assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale at 8-12 weeks after birth. Secondary outcomes include maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, routine child health assessments, including immunisation uptake and breastfeeding at 6 weeks. Other psychological outcomes (self efficacy) and mother-to-infant bonding will also be collected using validated tools.A sample size of 1316 will provide 90% power (at the 5% significance level) to detect increased engagement with antenatal services of 1.5 visits and a reduction of 1.5 in the average EPDS score for women with two or more social risk factors, with power in excess of this for women with any social risk factor. Analysis will be by intention to treat. Qualitative research will explore the POWs' daily work in context. This will complement the findings of the RCT through a triangulation of quantitative and qualitative data on the process of the intervention, and identify other contextual factors that affect the implementation of the intervention. DISCUSSION: The trial will provide high quality evidence as to whether or not lay support (POW) offered to women identified with social risk factors improves engagement with maternity services and reduces numbers of women with depression. MREC NUMBER: 10/H1207/23 TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN: ISRCTN35027323.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-11

APA Citation

Kenyon, S., Jolly, K., Hemming, K., Ingram, L., Gale, N., & Dann, S. et al. (2012). Evaluation of Lay Support in Pregnant women with Social risk (ELSIPS): a randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy And Childbirth, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-11

Rights

© 2012 Kenyon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download

Share

COinS