Date of Award
Spring 2020
Degree Type
Thesis
Department
History
Director of Thesis
Dr. Andrew Berns
First Reader
James Mock
Second Reader
James Mock
Abstract
Through a thorough examination of the underpinnings of Classical education, as well as the history of South Carolina College, it is clear that the classical system is superior to the later University system imposed upon the College during the Reconstruction period. Classical education began in the Greek philosophic schools, such as the Academy and the Lyceum, and was intended to enrich the soul of its students, as well as to equip them for leadership in the future. But the most important aspect of this education was its universality. It is highly ironic that the original concept of the University began with a hope for universality as well. After all, the very meaning of the word University reflects this high purpose. However, by the late nineteenth century, the University model had become polluted, and was used to promote skills-based learning, as opposed to the universal model it originally represented. When South Carolina College was forced to embrace the new system of specialized education, its set curriculum vanished, and its reputation vanished along with it.
First Page
1
Last Page
78
Recommended Citation
Cathcart, Robert D. III, "The Rise and Fall of South Carolina College" (2020). Senior Theses. 354.
https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/senior_theses/354
Rights
© 2020, Robert D Cathcart
Included in
Classical Literature and Philology Commons, Higher Education Commons, Intellectual History Commons, Liberal Studies Commons, Medieval History Commons, Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education Commons, United States History Commons