Date of Award
Spring 2026
Document Type
Open Access Thesis
Department
Psychology
First Advisor
Kimberly D. Becker
Abstract
Cultural competence is understood as a necessary piece in providing mental health services (American Psychological Association, 2017), however little research has evaluated how conversations pertaining to culture occur during clinical supervision. This study is designed to examine the frequency, content, and predictors of cultural discussions in 631 clinical supervision sessions between 93 supervisor-therapist dyads. Using transcripts from school-based mental health services in California and South Carolina, descriptive analyses were applied to identify commonly used words informed by multicultural dictionaries and the ADDRESSING model. The most commonly used words in the dataset pertained to gender (36.5%) and national origin (17.4%) cultural identity categories rather than race/ethnicity (7.5%). Regression analyses were used to examine how provider and youth characteristics (e.g., race/ethnicity, language spoken at home, presenting problems) predict both the number of cultural references and the breadth of identities discussed. Clinician characteristics, specifically supervisor racial/ethnic identity, were significant predictors (ps < .05) influencing conversations with cultural words while youth characteristics were not (ps > .05). There were also similar numbers of references to cultural words and identities across demographically and socio-politically diverse sites (ps > .05). These findings may inform supervision and training practices by highlighting how provider and contextual factors shape cultural conversations in supervision, with implications for improving culturally responsive mental health services.
Rights
© 2026, Rosalba Bonilla
Recommended Citation
Bonilla, R.(2026). Are We Talking About Culture?: Exploring Discussions In Clinical Supervision. (Master's thesis). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/8726