A Critique of Charles Peirce's Account of the Necessary Conditions for the Possibility of Experience
Date of Award
1-1-2013
Document Type
Open Access Dissertation
First Advisor
Thomas Burke
Abstract
Herein is investigated the effort to establish the necessary conditions for the possibility of experience begun by Immanuel Kant and carried further by Charles Peirce. I focus my attention on Peirce's development of a Kantian strategy for discovering and proving such conditions. The conclusion that I argue for is that such an effort requires the use of a rational intuitive faculty. Both Kant and even more vociferously Peirce overtly reject the existence of such a faculty, yet, I argue, it is difficult to make sense of certain crucial discoveries in its absence.
Rights
© 2013, Daniel Edward Kruidenier
Recommended Citation
Kruidenier, D. E.(2013). A Critique of Charles Peirce's Account of the Necessary Conditions for the Possibility of Experience. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/2456