How Has Health Literacy and Digital Health Literacy Scholarship Evolved? A Global, Qualitative Study
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Health literacy (HL) is a key social determinant of health (SDoH) and is of increasing importance in public health research and intervention for improved health outcomes. Definitions of HL and digital health literacy (DHL) have evolved over time as the field has expanded conceptualization from an individual focus to the broader community and organizational levels. Careful consideration of HL and DHL for a variety of contexts and audiences is critical given increased global adoption of digital technologies and responses to emerging public health challenges. This study aimed to capture researchers' conceptualizations of HL/DHL and their motivations to engage in this research with attention to SDoH and equity principles. We developed a survey comprising 32 open-ended and multiple-choice questions from which we present participant demographics and overall research affiliations (n = 193), and results from two multiple-choice and three open-ended questions. The three open-ended questions were inductively reviewed and coded using thematic analysis and iterative discussions between multiple coders, while the two multiple-choice questions were descriptively analyzed via SPSS. Findings are situated within the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and inform the international field of HL/DHL research by highlighting momentum and opportunities for increased scholarship.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Publication Info
Published in Health Promotion International, Volume 39, Issue 5, 2024.
APA Citation
Yelton, B., Mayank Sakhuja, Kavarana, S., Schaurer, L., Arent, M. A., Donelle, L., Macauda, M. M., Noblet, S., & Friedman, D. B. (2024). How has health literacy and digital health literacy scholarship evolved? A global, qualitative study. Health Promotion International, 39(5). https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae123
Rights
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com. This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights))