https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.07.002">
 

Document Type

Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Large bowel obstruction is an urgent condition which can progress to ischemia and perforation. The importance of prompt intervention has not been rigorously demonstrated. METHODS: Patients with bowel obstruction who underwent stoma, stent, and/or colectomy in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample were used to study prompt intervention (defined as occurring within 2 days of admission). Outcomes were inpatient mortality, discharge to home, and length of stay in an adjusted analysis. RESULTS: Among the 31,277 patients, prompt intervention occurred in 42.6%. In an adjusted analysis, prompt intervention was more likely in higher income patients and less likely in patients with comorbidities; among those with malignant obstruction, less likely in women, and among those with benign obstruction, less likely in Blacks. Inpatient mortality (6%) was not different between groups. Discharge home (71% vs 68%; p < 0.0001) and shorter LOS (-3 days) occurred in those managed promptly. CONCLUSION: Prompt intervention in large bowel obstruction results in decreased LOS and greater likelihood of discharge to home, but not a mortality benefit. Female, Black and lower income patients were less likely to have prompt intervention.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.07.002

APA Citation

Kwaan, M. R., Wu, Y., Ren, Y., & Sudha Xirasagar. (2022). Prompt intervention in large bowel obstruction management: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis. The American Journal of Surgery, 224(5), 1262–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.07.002

Rights

© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/).

Included in

Nursing Commons

Share

COinS