Abstract
Reviews and comments on the preceding essays in the SSL Symposium on Editing Scottish Literary Texts, setting them in the wider context of critical discussion, responding to some of the earlier comments comparing the recent collected editions of Walter Scott and James Hogg, and arguing that the "authentically democratic" work of making a fuller range of Scottish literary texts available moves critical discussion forward from the "tedious zero-sum game" of debating a static canon.
Recommended Citation
Duncan, Ian
(2013)
"The SSL Symposium on Editing: A Commentary,"
Studies in Scottish Literature:
Vol. 39:
Iss.
1, 47–52.
Available at:
https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ssl/vol39/iss1/8