Document Type
Article
Subject Area(s)
Environmental Sciences; Limnology; Water Resources
Abstract
Field and documentary data from Walnut Gulch Watershed, an instrumented semiarid drainage basin of approximately 150 km2 (57 mi2) in southeastern Arizona, show that 83% of the alluvium removed from the basin during a 15‐year erosion episode beginning about 1930 was excavated from the highest‐order stream. The amount of alluvium removed in the erosion episode would have been equal to a covering of about 4 cm (1.6 in) over the entire basin. The rate of sediment removal during the erosion episode was 18 times greater than the rate of present channel sediment transport. Production of sediment from slopes and channel throughput at present rates are approximately equal, and refilling will not occur under present conditions. The channel forms left by the massive evacuation of sediment impose controls on the spatial distribution of tractive force and total stream power that make renewed storage of sediment likely in only a few restricted locations. Modern instrumented records of a decade or more provide an inadequate perspective on long‐term sediment movement. Field and documentary data from Walnut Gulch Watershed, an instrumented semiarid drainage basin of approximately 150 km2 (57 mi2) in southeastern Arizona, show that 83% of the alluvium removed from the basin during a 15‐year erosion episode beginning about 1930 was excavated from the highest‐order stream. The amount of alluvium removed in the erosion episode would have been equal to a covering of about 4 cm (1.6 in) over the entire basin. The rate of sediment removal during the erosion episode was 18 times greater than the rate of present channel sediment transport. Production of sediment from slopes and channel throughput at present rates are approximately equal, and refilling will not occur under present conditions. The channel forms left by the massive evacuation of sediment impose controls on the spatial distribution of tractive force and total stream power that make renewed storage of sediment likely in only a few restricted locations. Modern instrumented records of a decade or more provide an inadequate perspective on long‐term sediment movement.
Publication Info
Published in Water Resources Research, Volume 19, Issue 3, 1983, pages 643-652.