ORCID iD
Garimella: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7472-4690
Marwah: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0660-0849
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Knowledge graph (KG) schema engineering is labor-intensive and resists automation at scale. We investigate whether LLMs can generate domain-specific KG schemas of sufficient quality for downstream symbolic reasoning. We propose a tiered contextual framework that varies domain context richness across four levels: zero context, domain scope, task requirements, and data distribution. Generated schemas are evaluated intrinsically on BioRED (600 PubMed abstracts, multi-type entities and relations), where automated tiered schemas match an established KG construction baseline at 79.9% EC, with edge conformance rising from 47.5% at L1 to a stable 78–80% from L2 onward. Extrinsic evaluation on a 50-record MedHop controlled ablation shows that task requirements are the context level that improves utility, yielding 14% QA accuracy, a 6-point gain over domain scope alone. Data-distribution context achieves complete entity type coverage but does not further improve QA accuracy. An 86-point gap between the best schema-guided condition and the unstructured retrieval ceiling is closed by a schema-free KG under the same 1-hop retrieval, tracing the bottleneck to relations discarded during schema-guided extraction. LLM-generated schemas are viable, low-cost seeds for KG engineering pipelines; task requirements represent the minimum viable context threshold for neurosymbolic applications.
Publication Info
Postprint version. Published in AI Trustworthiness and Risk Assessment for Challenged Contexts (ATRACC), AAAI Fall Symposium, Fall 2026.
APA Citation
Garimella, R., Marwah, R., Jain, A., Bansal, K., & Sheth, A. (2026). Context matters: Evaluating LLM-generated knowledge graph schemas. AI Trustworthiness and Risk Assessment for Challenged Contexts (ATRACC), AAAI Fall Symposium.
Rights
Copyright © 2027, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved